4.3 Article

Bi-directional evolutionary 3D topology optimization with a deep neural network

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 3509-3519

出版社

KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-022-0628-2

关键词

Topology optimization; Deep learning; BESO; CNN; Python

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1A2C1102742]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C1102742] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines deep learning and neural networks with the BESO topology method, utilizing pre-trained digital images to quickly obtain optimal topology solutions. A new post-processor is developed to reconstruct the relative locations among finite elements in the raw outputs, resulting in improved optimization efficiency.
The FEM-based topology optimization repeats usually finite element analyses many times to converge to the stopping criteria. If the near-optimal topology data are available in advance at the beginning of an optimization process, the iterative computation could be greatly reduced. In an effort to obtain swiftly optimum topology solutions, the deep learning and neural networks with a special segmentation scheme of digital images are combined with the BESO (bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization) topology method in this study. The pre-trained digital images of 3200 optimum topologies construct the design domain for the main topology optimization. Additionally, a new post-processor is developed in order to reconstruct the relative locations among finite elements in the raw outputs generated by the neural network. The proposed method has been demonstrated to be efficient in lowering the iterations with several 2D and 3D optimization examples. The iteration counts can be reduced 63% for a 2D example and by 72.5% for a 3D one, compared to BESO results alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据