4.6 Article

Structural and magnetic studies of coprecipitated Me-spinel (Me = Co, Ni, Cu arid Mg) ferrite nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report investigates the synthesis and characterization of cobalt, nickel, copper, and magnesium nanoferrites. The results show that the synthesized nanoparticles have a spinel structure and agglomerated morphology. Mossbauer spectroscopy reveals the occupation of Fe3+ on two sub-lattices of the spinel system. The research also examines the magnetic properties of the spinel ferrites.
The report attempts to study some spinel such as cobalt (Co-F), nickel (Ni-F), copper (Cu-F) and magnesium (Mg-F) nanoferrites, which are synthesized by coprecipitation route and annealed at 850 degrees C for 2 h. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns depict the formation of single cubic spinel structure (Fd-3m). Thereby, lattice parameter is ranging between 8.3420 and 8.4009 angstrom, while average crystallite size is found in 20-38 nm. Transmission electron and scanning electron microscopies exhibit that the nanoparticles are agglomerated and revealing mixture of spherical and irregular shapes. The fit of Co-F, Ni-F and Cu-F room Fe-57 Mossbauer spectra was established with two sextets, which reflects that the Fe3+ is occupied two sub-lattices of spinel system. A weak percentage of quadruple doublet, 2%, was observed in both Ni-F and Cu-F spectra. Exceptionally, the Mg-F room Fe-57 Mossbauer spectrum indicates broadening lines due to disordering of iron magnetic moments because of small nanoparticle size (20 nm), it was fitted with hyperfine field distribution, Mg-F spectrum was also collected at 6 K reflecting a ferrimagnetic ordering according to Neel's theory. M(T) curves indicate that the blocking temperature is higher than 300 K, except the Mg-F sample shows a T-B of similar to 226 K. Besides, the M(H) loops at 5 K exhibit a soft behavior and the magnetic parameters like M-s, M-r, mu(e)/ M-r/M-s ration, H-c and K-a have determined for the studied spinel ferrites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据