4.6 Article

Research on Bi contents addition into Sn-Cu-based lead-free solder alloy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-08464-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52165047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of Bi additions on the properties of Sn-2Cu solder alloy were investigated. The addition of 5 wt% Bi improved the thermal properties, refined the microstructure, and increased the microhardness and tensile strength. Additionally, a dense passivation film formed on the alloy surface, providing excellent corrosion resistance.
This work aimed to investigate the effects of some Bi additions (x = 0, 1, 3, and 5 wt%) added to Sn-2Cu solder alloy on its thermal properties, mechanical performance, and resistance to corrosion, which was investigated by using the Differential scanning calorimetry, Scanning electron microscope, Vickers Hardness Tester, Universal testing machine, Electrochemical workstation, and X-ray diffraction. The experimental results showed that doping 5 wt% Bi could reduce the melting point from 239.7 to 226.6 degrees C and the undercooling from 24.0 to 9.0 degrees C, which could improve the thermal properties. Moreover, the Bi addition could refine the microstructure and decrease the Cu6Sn5 IMC phases' size. With the addition of 5 wt% Bi, the microhardness and tensile strength reached the highest value of 20.13 HV and 57.64 MPa, respectively, due to the solid solution strengthening and precipitation strengthening. The electrochemical corrosion behaviors were performed to use the potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The obtained results revealed that a dense passivation film was formed on the surface of Sn-2Cu-1Bi alloy to prevent the alloy from being further corroded, which had the lowest value of corrosion current density (0.034 mu A center dot cm(-2)) and biggest value of total resistance (200.4 k omega center dot cm(2)). Therefore, the Sn-2Cu-1Bi alloy had best corrosion resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据