4.6 Article

The method of introducing oxygen vacancy into La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-based catalyst: enhancing the ORR and OER performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 26, 页码 12364-12376

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07359-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-based perovskite catalysts have been created by sol-gel method, which can substitute expensive precious metal catalysts and exhibit higher ORR and OER performance.
Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) have been widely used in energy conversion devices; therefore, the demand for corresponding catalysts is increasing each year. Pt and IrO2 are considered to be the most advanced ORR and OER catalysts; however, these expensive precious metal catalysts hinder their extensive application in practical applications. Herein, a series of La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-based perovskite catalysts (La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-PEI, La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-Fe2O3, La0.8Sr0.2FeO3) have been created by sol-gel method to achieve highly efficient catalytic performance for ORR and OER and these perovskite oxides stand out with raw material availability to substitute noble metal as bi-functional composite catalysts. The superior ORR performance (the onset potential is 1.061 V and the half-wave potential is 0.672 V), significant enhancement of OER performance (the onset potential is 1.553 V and current density is 5.53 mA cm(-2) at 1.8 V) and the electron transfer number (3.69) of La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-PEI are significantly higher than those of two others, which benefited from the introducing of carbon in the preparation of perovskite, increasing the oxygen vacancy concentration on the surface of the catalyst, adsorbing more highly reactive oxygen species O-2(2-)/O-, and enhancing the ORR and OER performance of the catalyst. This article suggests that carbon introducing is a promising strategy to improve the electrocatalytic activity for ORR and OER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据