4.5 Article

Investigation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pd/Co2FeSi/MgO structures with evaluations of magnetic property, crystal structure, and elemental mapping

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169796

关键词

Full-Heusler alloy; Half-metallic ferromagnet; Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy; Bulk magnetic anisotropy; Scanning transmission electron microscope

资金

  1. NIMS microstructural characterization platform as a program of Nanotechnology Platform of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [A-19-NM-0111, A-20-NM-0111]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 25889021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bulk magnetic anisotropy of the CFS layers contributes to PMA, and tensile strain for out-of-plane is induced when the thickness is above 1.8 nm; Pd may exist at the CFS/MgO interface, causing bulk anisotropy of the samples with CFS thickness less than 2 nm.
The authors investigated origins of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) in a multilayer of full-Heusler Co2FeSi (CFS) alloys, MgO, and Pd. The CFS thickness dependence of the magnetic properties indicated that the bulk magnetic anisotropy of the CFS layers also contributed to the PMA even in the samples where the CFS thickness t(CFS) was 10 nm. The anisotropy constant was drastically increased at t(CFS) = 1.8 nm, and 0.7 nm. The crystal structure analysis indicated that CFS layers had the tensile strain for out-of-plane when the thickness was thicker than 1.8 nm, which can induce the bulk magnetic anisotropy via the magnetostrictive effect. The elemental mapping by a scanning transmission electron microscope revealed that approximately 2 nm thick Pd existed at the CFS/MgO interface. The authors considered the whole CFS layers could contain Pd when the thickness of CFS was less than 2 nm. This Pd might cause the bulk anisotropy of the samples with the CFS thickness below 2 nm since some Pd alloys and Pd/Co and Pd/Fe multilayers have large bulk magnetic anisotropy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据