4.7 Article

The influence of complexing agents on the cobalt-based catalysts properties and activities

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.035

关键词

Cobalt aluminate; 1,4-butanediol; gamma-butyrolactone; Claisen-Schmidt condensation

资金

  1. Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PNIII-P4-ID-PCE-2020-0580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, CoAl2O4 samples were synthesized using sol-gel method with different complexing agents. The presence of oxalic acid as a complexation agent favors the expansion of Co3O4 phase. In the presence of citric acid as a complexing agent, CoAl2O4 is the dominant phase. The catalytic performances of CoAl2O4 spinel oxides were evaluated and showed good relationship with the Co3+/Co2+ ratio, reactants conversion, and products yield.
In this study, CoAl2O4 samples were synthesized using sol-gel method in the presence of citric acid (CoAlCA), malic acid (CoAlMA), oxalic acid (CoAlOA) and urea (CoAlU) as complexing agents. The presence of cubic spinel structure for both CoAl2O4 and Co3O4 phases was confirmed by XRD. FTIR analysis emphasized that the composition of Co3+ ions decreased in order: CoAlOA (50.3 %) > CoAlU (41.8 %) > C oAlMA (40.7 %) > CoAlCA (24.3 %), which denotes that the presence of oxalic acid as complexation agent favors cobalt oxidation from Co2+ to Co3+ and, consequently, the expansion of Co3O4 phase. In the presence of citric acid, as a complexing agent, tetrahedral Co2+ ions prevailed and CoAl2O4 is the dominant phase. The catalytic performances of CoAl2O4 spinel oxides have been evaluated in lactonization of 1,4-butanediol, coupled with acetophenone hydrogenation and in the Claisen-Schmidt condensation reaction of benzaldehyde with acetophenone and the results provided a good relationship between Co3+/Co2+ ratio, the reactants conversion and the products yield. (C) 2022 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据