4.3 Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies

Brian K. P. Goh et al.

Summary: The study found significant correlations between the four contemporary difficulty scoring systems and outcome measures associated with intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic hepatectomies. The Southampton scoring system showed poorer performance in certain aspects compared to the other systems in the cohort of patients.
Article Surgery

Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases

Christian Hobeika et al.

Summary: The study found that the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification is a valuable difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic repeat liver resections procedures. Additionally, previous major resection and presence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are independent risk factors of unexpected difficulty.

SURGERY (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a robotic effect?

Kenneth Luberice et al.

Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a certain criteria for robotic hepatectomy. Results showed that as operative difficulty increased, estimated blood loss and operative duration also increased. However, postoperative outcomes were similar irrespective of the difficulty level, suggesting that the robotic approach may have a mitigating effect on postoperative outcomes.
Review Surgery

Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Darren Chua et al.

Summary: The overall learning curve for MIH has decreased steadily over time, and the learning curve for RLR appears less steep compared to LLR.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2021)

Article Oncology

When should we choose a laparoscopic approach? A high-volume center recommendation score

Benone-Iulian Mosteanu et al.

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD (2020)

Article Surgery

Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Jing Yang et al.

JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES (2019)

Editorial Material Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Difficulty scores in laparoscopic liver surgery-getting closer to a powerful and necessary tool

Ruben Ciria et al.

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION (2019)

Article Surgery

Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification

Yoshikuni Kawaguchi et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2018)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection

Felix Krenzien et al.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2018)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

A novel scoring system for conversion and complication in laparoscopic liver resection

Yifan Tong et al.

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION (2018)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Evolution and revolution of laparoscopic liver resection in Japan

Hironori Kaneko et al.

ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY (2017)

Article Surgery

Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Hiroki Uchida et al.

JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection?

Go Wakabayashi

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection

Daisuke Ban et al.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)