4.7 Article

OsMPK4 promotes phosphorylation and degradation of IPA1 in response to salt stress to confer salt tolerance in rice

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 766-775

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2022.06.009

关键词

Oryza sativa; MPK; OsMPK4; IPA1; Salt tolerance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31788103, 32122064, 32122012]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA24030504, 2019099]
  3. China Agricultural Research System [CARS-01-4]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M650885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salt stress has detrimental effects on plant growth and development in rice. The OsMPK4-IPA1 signaling pathway plays a regulatory role in salt tolerance, providing insights for breeding salt-tolerant rice varieties.
Salt stress adversely affects plant growth, development, and crop yield. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most salt-sensitive cereal crops, especially at the early seedling stage. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/MPK) cascades have been shown to play critical roles in salt response in Arabidopsis. However, the roles of the MPK cascade signaling in rice salt response and substrates of OsMPK remain largely unknown. Here, we report that the salt-induced OsMPK4-Ideal Plant Architecture 1 (IPA1) signaling pathway regulates the salt tolerance in rice. Under salt stress, OsMPK4 could interact with IPA1 and phosphorylate IPA1 at Thr180, leading to degradation of IPA1. Genetic evidence shows that IPA1 is a negative regulator of salt tolerance in rice, whereas OsMPK4 promotes salt response in an IPA1-dependent manner. Taken together, our results uncover an OsMPK4-IPA1 signal cascade that modulates the salt stress response in rice and sheds new light on the breeding of salt-tolerant rice varieties. Copyright (C) 2022, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Genetics Society of China. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据