4.8 Article

Distribution of polymer nanoparticles by convection-enhanced delivery to brain tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 103-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.006

关键词

Polymer nanoparticles; Convection-enhanced delivery (CED); Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health through National Cancer Institute [CA149128]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [TL1-TR000141]
  3. National Science Foundation [DGE-1122492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a fatal brain tumor characterized by infiltration beyond the margins of the main tumor mass and local recurrence after surgery. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) poses the most significant hurdle to brain tumor treatment. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) allows for local administration of agents, overcoming the restrictions of the BBB. Recently, polymer nanoparticles have been demonstrated to penetrate readily through the healthy brain when delivered by CED, and size has been shown to be a critical factor for nanoparticle penetration. Because these brain-penetrating nanoparticles (BPNPs) have high potential for treatment of intracranial tumors since they offer the potential for cell targeting and controlled drug release after administration, here we investigated the intratumoral CED infusions of PLGA BPNPs in animals bearing either U87 or RG2 intracranial tumors. We demonstrate that the overall volume of distribution of these BPNPs was similar to that observed in healthy brains; however, the presence of tumors resulted in asymmetric and heterogeneous distribution patterns, with substantial leakage into the peritumoral tissue. Together, our results suggest that CED of BPNPs should be optimized by accounting for tumor geometry, in terms of location, size and presence of necrotic regions, to determine the ideal infusion site and parameters for individual tumors. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据