Specific energy consumption and quality of Citrus hystrix leaves treated using convective and microwave vacuum methods

This study compared the effects of three drying techniques on Citrus hystrix leaves: convective hot air drying (CAD), microwave vacuum drying (MVD), and convective hot air pre-drying followed by microwave vacuum finishing drying (CPD-MVFD). As a control, freeze-drying (FD) was employed. As a result, the modified Page model best described the drying kinetics of C. hystrix leaves. Furthermore, CPD-MVFD significantly lowered the specific energy consumption by 51.6%. Meanwhile, MVD, at density of 12 W/g, retained the greatest antioxidant capacity, TPC content, and volatile compounds. In physical terms, CPD-MVFD and MVD performed best in retaining the color characteristics of C. hystrix leaves under all circumstances. Finally, all samples were microbiologically stable. In conclusion, it is suggested that MVD with a power density of 12 W/g be used for drying C. hystrix leaves, due to its low specific energy consumption, strong antioxidant and TPC capacity, and good recovery of volatile organic compounds.

Automated summary

This study compared the effects of three drying techniques on Citrus hystrix leaves and found that CPD-MVFD and MVD performed best in terms of physical characteristics, with MVD having low energy consumption and good antioxidant capacity.