4.7 Article

In vitro gastric digestion and emptying of tsampa under simulated elderly and young adult digestive conditions using a dynamic stomach system

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 327, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111054

关键词

Tsampa; Starch hydrolysis; Peptides release; Elderly; In vitro stomach system; Rheology

资金

  1. Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University project by China Agricultural University [2019TC54]
  2. Tibet Natural Science Foundation [XZ2019ZRG-62]
  3. State Key Research and Development Plan Modern Food Processing and Food Storage and Transportation Technology and Equipment [2018YFD0400102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantified the gastric digestion and emptying of a traditional Tibetan diet in elderly individuals. The results showed that elderly individuals had slower gastric emptying rates and impaired protein digestion compared to young adults. These findings highlight the importance of developing food products suitable for the elderly.
The world population is inevitably aging tremendously, whereas quantitative studies on elderly digestion is scarce. This study quantified in vitro gastric digestion and emptying of a traditional Tibetan diet (tsampa) in the elderly using a dynamic stomach system. The emptying half-time for its solid fraction was 83.1 and 103.4 min under young adult and elderly conditions, respectively. After 180 min digestion, the starch digestibility was 13.7% and 9.7% for the elderly and adult, respectively. However, the total peptides released was 44.9 g/100 g protein under elderly conditions, significantly lower than that in adult digestion (50.7 g/100 g protein). The decreased gastric emptying rate and impaired protein digestion are supported by greater viscosity and denser structure of the digesta during elderly digestion due to the reduced gastric secretions and weaker contractions. The present study is meaningful for development of highland barley-based food products that may be more suitable for the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据