4.6 Article

Packaged foods containing non-nutritive sweeteners also have high added sugar content: A Brazilian survey

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104626

关键词

Sweeteners; Sugars; Processed foods; Food label; Food composition; Food labelling

资金

  1. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES)
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) of the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Communication [440040/2014-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of added sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) in packaged foods sold in a major supermarket in Brazil. Most of the products analyzed contained at least one type of sweetener, and a significant proportion of products containing both added sugars and NNS were classified as high in added sugar.
This study investigated the use of added sugars and non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) in 4805 packaged foods (including non-alcoholic beverages) sold in a major supermarket in Brazil. The ingredient lists of all products were searched for the presence of added sugars and NNS. The added sugar content was estimated and compared between products containing added sugar, with and without NNS. Using criteria set by the new Brazilian food label rules, we determined whether foods with added sugars and NNS were classified as high in added sugar. Most products (66.7%) contained at least one type of sweetener (added sugars or NNS). Of the products containing NNS (n = 597), 81.5% also contained added sugar. Products containing both NNS and added sugar ingredients showed a lower overall added sugar content than products containing added sugars only. However, for a few food categories (chocolates, dairy and non-dairy dessert mixes and candies), the added sugar content did not differ significantly between products with and without NNS. Sixty-three percent of products containing both added sugar and NNS were classified as high in added sugar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据