4.6 Article

Attraction or Repelling Effects of Commercial Plant Essential Oils on the Synanthropic Cheiracanthium mildei (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 115, 期 5, 页码 1472-1479

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toac086

关键词

plant extract; biocontrol; olfactory test; eugenol; pesticide alternative

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LTAUSA18171]
  2. METROFOOD-CZ research infrastructure project (MEYS grant) [LM2018100]
  3. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic [MZe RO0418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the attraction or repellence of 15 essential oils from plants to the northern yellow sac spider. Three plants showed significant repellent effects, while some oils appeared to have an attraction effect. One plant oil was found to reduce the propensity of spiders to construct silk retreats.
The northern yellow sac spider Cheiracanthium mildei L. Koch, is expanding its range to Central Europe, especially to synanthropic habitats. The spiders become unwanted companions because of the unreasonable fear - arachnophobia, and estetic reason - silk retreats in corners, capturing dust. The most commonly used substances against spiders are pesticides, which are, however, toxic. In our work we tested the attraction or repellence of 15 essential oils (EO) from plants representing eight families to C. mildei. Our research has shown a significant repellent effect of EO from three plants, namely Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. et L. M. Perry (Myrtales: Myrtaceae), Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. (Poales: Bromeliaceae) and Musa sp. (L.) (Zingiberales: Musaceae). In contrast, some EOs appeared to have an attraction effect, particularly Carum carvi L. (Apiales: Apiaceae). Zingiber officinale Roscoe (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae) reduced the tendency of spiders to construct the silken retreat. S. aromaticum, A. sativus, Musa sp. and Z. officinale have the potential to be used as natural repellents against spiders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据