4.3 Article

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular risk in patients with prediabetes: A secondary analysis of the D2d study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108230

关键词

Vitamin D; Prediabetes; Cardiovascular disease risk reduction; MACE

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [U34DK091958]
  2. NIDDK
  3. Office of Dietary Supplements of the National Institutes of Health [U01DK098245]
  4. NIDDK project scientist as a member of the D2d Research Group
  5. American Diabetes Association [1-14-D2d-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with prediabetes, finding that it did not reduce Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) but did have a small favorable effect on ASCVD risk score.
Aims: Low blood 25(OH)D level is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Additionally, individuals with prediabetes are at higher risk for CVD than individuals with normoglycemia. We investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on CVD outcomes in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study, a large trial among adults with prediabetes. Methods: 2423 participants were randomized to 4000 IU/day of vitamin D3 or placebo and followed for median 3.0 years for new-onset diabetes. In pre-specified secondary analyses, we examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE); expanded MACE (MACE + revascularization); atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk score; and individual CVD risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). Cox models compared hazard ratios (HR) between the two groups on MACE and expanded MACE. Results: Mean age was 60 years, 45 % were women, 13 % had history of CVD. Twenty-one participants assigned to vitamin D and 12 participants assigned to placebo met the MACE outcome (HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.89 to 3.69). There were 27 expanded MACE outcomes in each group (HR 1.02, 95%CI, 0.59 to 1.76). There were no sig-nificant differences between vitamin D and placebo in individual CVD risk factors, but change in ASCVD risk score favored the vitamin D group (-0.45 %, 95%CI-0.75 to-0.15). Conclusions: In people with prediabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency and with intermediate CVD risk, vitamin D supplementation did not decrease MACE but had a small favorable effect on ASCVD risk score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据