4.7 Review

Invited review: Selective use of antimicrobials in dairy cattle at drying-off

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 105, 期 9, 页码 7161-7189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21455

关键词

stewardship in the dairy industry; dry cow therapy; antimicrobial stewardship; dairy cow; mastitis

资金

  1. Industrial Research Chair in Infectious Diseases of Dairy Cattle - Canada's Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Industrial Research Chair Program (Ottawa, ON, Canada)
  2. Alberta Milk (Edmonton, AB, Canada)
  3. Dairy Farmers of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada)
  4. WestGen Endowment Fund (Milner, BC, Canada)
  5. BC Dairy Association (Burnaby, BC, Canada)
  6. Canadian Dairy Network (Guelph, ON, Canada)
  7. Lactanet (Guelph, ON, Canada)
  8. SaskMilk (Regina, SK, Canada)
  9. Dairy Farmers of Manitoba (Winnipeg, MB, Canada)
  10. MSD Animal Health (Boxmeer, The Netherlands)
  11. Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network (Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada)
  12. Canadian Dairy Network (Ottawa, ON, Canada)
  13. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship (Ottawa, ON, Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blanket dry cow therapy may no longer be necessary for all dairy farms due to improvements in udder health and the introduction of teat sealants. Selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) can be a viable option for maintaining udder health and milk production while improving antimicrobial stewardship. Methods for selecting cows or mammary quarters for treatment include somatic cell count thresholds, pathogen identification, clinical mastitis history, or a combination of criteria. Concurrent teat sealant use is recommended, especially in quarters not receiving intramammary antimicrobials.
Administering intramammary antimicrobials to all mammary quarters of dairy cows at drying-off [i.e., blanket dry cow therapy (BDCT)] has been a mainstay of mastitis prevention and control. However, as udder health has considerably improved over recent decades with reductions in intramammary infection prevalence at drying-off and the introduction of teat sealants, BDCT may no longer be necessary on all dairy farms, thereby supporting antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This narrative review summarizes available literature regarding current dry cow therapy practices and associ-ated impacts of selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) on udder health, milk production, economics, antimicro-bial use, and antimicrobial resistance. Various methods to identify infections at drying-off that could benefit from antimicrobial treatment are described for select-ing cows or mammary quarters for treatment, includ-ing utilizing somatic cell count thresholds, pathogen identification, previous clinical mastitis history, or a combination of criteria. Selection methods may be enacted at the herd, cow, or quarter levels. Producers' and veterinarians' motivations for antimicrobial use are discussed. Based on review findings, SDCT can be ad-opted without negative consequences for udder health and milk production, and concurrent teat sealant use is recommended, especially in udder quarters receiving no intramammary antimicrobials. Furthermore, herd selection should be considered for SDCT implementa-tion in addition to cow or quarter selection, as BDCT may still be temporarily necessary in some herds for optimal mastitis control. Costs and benefits of SDCT vary among herds, whereas impacts on antimicrobial resistance remain unclear. In summary, SDCT is a vi-able management option for maintaining udder health and milk production while improving antimicrobial stewardship in the dairy industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据