4.6 Article

Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional CNN-Based Simultaneous Detection and Activity Classification of Construction Workers

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001024

关键词

Construction workers' activity recognition; Computer vision; Convolutional neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the advantages of a fully optimized method and an annotated untrimmed data set for activity recognition of construction workers. It proposes an improved version of YOWO to enhance detection performance and conducts a sensitivity analysis and a case study to compare different methods.
The type and duration of construction workers' activities are useful information for project management purposes. Therefore, several studies have used surveillance cameras and computer vision to automate the time-consuming process of manually gathering this information. However, the three-stage method they have adopted consisting of separate detection, tracking, and activity classification modules is not fully optimized. Additionally, the activity classification module is trained per-clip/segment on trimmed video clips and fails when applied to long untrimmed construction videos. This paper aims to (1) investigate the benefits of a fully optimized method such as you only watch once (YOWO) and a per-frame and per-worker annotated untrimmed data set over the previous approach for activity recognition of construction workers; (2) propose an improved version of YOWO, called YOWO53, to improve detection performance; (3) propose a semiautomatic data set annotation; (4) conduct a sensitivity analysis to compare the performance of YOWO, YOWO53, and the three-stage method; and (5) conduct a case study to compute the percentage of different workers' activities. YOWO53 improves the detection recall of YOWO by up to 3%, and the classification accuracy of the three-stage method by 16.3%. Although YOWO53 has a lower inference speed, it is still sufficiently fast for productivity analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据