4.5 Article

The brain of the tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis). X. The spinal cord

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 530, 期 15, 页码 2692-2710

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.25350

关键词

Carnivora; cauda equina; Pholidota; >; >; >; sensorimotor; spinal cord

资金

  1. National Research Foundation-Third World Academy of Science African Renaissance Doctoral Fellowship
  2. South African National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite its short length, the spinal cord of the tree pangolin has a similar anatomical organization to that of other mammals, indicating potential similarities in its functional aspects.
The spinal cord of the tree pangolin is known to be very short compared to the overall length of the body and tail. Here, we provide a description of the tree pangolin spinal cord to determine whether the short length contributes to specific structural, and potentially functional, differences. The short spinal cord of the adult tree pangolin, at around 13 cm, terminates at the midthoracic level. Within this shortened spinal cord, we could identify six regions, which from rostral to caudal include the prebrachial, brachial, interramal, crural, postcrural, and caudal regions, with both the brachial and crural regions showing distinct swellings. The chemoarchitecture of coronal sections through these regions confirmed regional assignation, being most readily delineated by the presence of cholinergic neurons forming the intermediolateral column in the interramal region and the sacral parasympathetic nucleus in the postcrural region. The 10 laminae of Rexed were observed throughout the spinal cord and presented with an anatomical organization similar to that observed in other mammals. Despite the shortened length of the tree pangolin spinal cord, the regional and laminar anatomical organization is very similar to that observed in other mammals. This indicates that the functional aspects of the short tree pangolin spinal cord can be inferred from what is known in other mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据