4.5 Article

Role of IL-10 and IL-22 cytokines in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and their clinical significance

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24573

关键词

interleukin-10; interleukin-22; thrombocytopenia

资金

  1. New Bud Fund of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University [Kx082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that IL-10 and IL-22 are significantly imbalanced in active ITP patients, and may predict the clinical course of the disease.
Background Immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease that leads to accelerated platelet clearance. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical role of cytokines in ITP patients and to correlate them with disease stages. Materials and Methods A total of 110 ITP patients were enrolled, including 55 with active ITP, 55 with remission ITP, and 55 with healthy controls. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was used to examine IL-10 and IL-22 serum levels in all subjects. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of IL-10 and IL-22 in PBMC. The clinical significance of both cytokines was assessed using ROC analysis. Results IL-10 serum levels in active ITP patients were significantly lower than in control and remission ITP subjects (p < 0.05). IL-22 serum levels were elevated in active ITP patients compared to the control and remission group (p < 0.05). mRNA expressions of IL-10 and IL-22 in active ITP patients were also having a significant difference from than control and remission ITP group (p < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that IL-10 and IL-22 can differentiate the ITP patients from controls. A positive correlation between serum IL-10 and PBMC IL-10 with statistical significance was observed. Similarly, the serum IL-22 and PBMC IL-22 were correlated positively with statistical significance. Conclusion IL-10 and IL-22 seem to predict the clinical course of ITP, as a significant imbalance of these cytokines was detected in active ITP patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据