4.7 Article

A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131999

关键词

Life cycle assessment; Lithium-ion batteries; Lead-acid battery systems; Grid storage application

资金

  1. Research Initiative on Sustainable Industry and Society (IRIS) at the ITM School, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries and lead-acid batteries for stationary grid storage applications using life cycle assessment. The results show that lithium-ion batteries have fewer environmental impacts in various categories compared to lead-acid batteries. The study also suggests that increasing the contribution of renewable energy can reduce the environmental impact during the use phase.
Lithium-ion battery technology is one of the innovations gaining interest in utility-scale energy storage. However, there is a lack of scientific studies about its environmental performance. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries and conventional lead-acid batteries for stationary grid storage applications using life cycle assessment. The cradle-to-grave life cycle study shows that the environmental impacts of the lead-acid battery measured in per kWh energy delivered are: 2 kg CO2eq (climate change), 33 MJ (fossil fuel use), 0.02 mol H + eq (acidification potential), 10- 7 disease incidence (PM2.5 emission), and 8 x 10(-4) kg Sbeq (minerals and metals use). The nickel cobalt aluminum battery is the best performer for climate change and resource use (fossil fuels) among the analysed lithium-ion batteries, with 45% less impact. The nickel cobalt manganese battery performs better for the acidification potential and particulate matter impact categories, with 67% and 50% better performance than lead-acid. The lithium iron phosphate battery is the best performer at 94% less impact for the minerals and metals resource use category. The use stage electricity and battery cell manufacturing processes have the highest contribution for the most impact categories. The sensitivity analysis shows that the use-phase environmental impact decreases with an increase in renewable energy contribution in the use phase. The lithium-ion batteries have fewer environmental impacts than lead-acid batteries for the observed environmental impact categories. The study can be used as a reference to decide how to substitute lead acid batteries with lithium-ion batteries for grid energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据