4.7 Article

A novel and clean utilization of converter sludge by co-reduction roasting with high-phosphorus iron ore to produce powdery reduced iron

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132362

关键词

Converter sludge; High-phosphorus iron ore; Co-reduction roasting; Powdery reduced iron; Clean utilization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874017]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2902404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper designed a co-reduction roasting followed by magnetic separation process to achieve the full recycling and clean utilization of converter sludge (CS) and upgrade high-phosphorus iron ore (HPIO), realizing the comprehensive and green utilization of CS.
The efficient and harmless utilization of converter sludge (CS) still faces problems. In the traditional roasting process of high-phosphorus iron ore (HPIO), a large amount of sodium or calcium salt needs to be added to enhance iron recovery and dephosphorization, which leads to an increase in production costs. In this paper, the co-reduction roasting followed by magnetic separation process was designed to realize the full recycling and clean utilization of CS and upgrade HPIO. The results show that the hazardous CS can serve as an ideal admixture in this process which ameliorated the conversion of iron oxides to metallic iron and inhibited the reduction of phosphorus in iron oxides in HPIO. And the element of iron in CS was fully recycled as well. Under optimal conditions, the powdery reduced iron with 93.45% Fe and 0.09% P was produced, which can be a superior substitute for scrap steel in steelmaking, and the iron recovery reached 96.10%. The tailings were cleaned with a leaching toxicity significantly lower than the standard threshold, and the composition indicate that they were excellent raw material for cement production. This novel process realizes the comprehensive and green utilization of CS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据