4.6 Article

Melamine sponge functionalized with carbon nanodots for the extraction of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and musks from environmental samples prior to their determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1679, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463375

关键词

Melamine sponge; Graphene quantum dots; PAHs; Musks; GC-MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the functionalization of melamine sponge (MeS) with graphene quantum dots (GQDs) for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and musks from environmental samples was investigated. The results showed that the synthesized MeS@GQDs exhibited good repeatability and satisfactory recoveries in the analysis of soil samples and treated effluents.
In this study, the functionalization of melamine sponge (MeS) with graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and its use as a sorbent for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and musks from environmental samples are presented. The MeS@GQDs is prepared by modification of the MeS with GQDs in a one-pot, single-step, in situ synthesis, using citric acid as carbon source. The produced MeS@GQDs was used to develop and optimize an analytical method based on solid-phase extraction mode, for the subsequent analysis of soil samples and treated effluents exploiting the extraction properties of the synthesized MeS@GQDs. The developed method not only presented satisfactory repeatability (RSD<8.7%) and inter-day repeatability (RSD<9.6%), but also its limits of quantification were found to be low (15-80 ng L-1). Moreover, the proposed method was linear in a wide range of concentrations (0.015-11.8 mu g L-1) and the recoveries from difficult matrixes, such as treated effluents and soil, were satisfactory. Overall, the use of the sorbent for the development of a new analytical method was found to be advantageous as compared with other reported methods. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据