4.7 Article

Accurate non-adiabatic couplings from optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functionals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 157, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099854

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation within the framework of the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  3. European Union Seventh Framework Program [291763]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EG397/4-1]
  5. Gauss Center for Supercomputing e.V. through the John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC)
  6. Technical University of Munich-Institute for Advanced Study
  7. German Excellence Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate non-adiabatic couplings can be calculated using the optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functionals within the framework of linear-response time-dependent density functional theory, providing an efficient alternative to wave-function-based techniques in the modeling of radiationless decay mechanisms in photochemical processes.
Precise theoretical calculations of non-adiabatic couplings, which describe the interaction between two Born-Oppenheimer surfaces, are important for the modeling of radiationless decay mechanisms in photochemical processes. Here, we demonstrate that accurate non-adiabatic couplings can be calculated in the framework of linear-response time-dependent density functional theory by using non-empirical, optimally tuned range-separated hybrid (OT-RSH) functionals. We focus on molecular radicals, in which ultrafast non-radiative decay plays a crucial role, to find that the OT-RSH functional compares well to wave-function-based reference data and competes with the accuracy of semi-empirical CAM-B3LYP calculations. Our findings show that the OT-RSH approach yields very accurate non-adiabatic couplings and, therefore, provides a computationally efficient alternative to wave-function-based techniques. (C) 2022 Author(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据