4.7 Article

Phospholipid acyl tail affects lipid headgroup orientation and membrane hydration

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 156, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0092237

关键词

-

资金

  1. MaxWater Initiative from the Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomembrane hydration is crucial for understanding processes at biological interfaces. While the effect of the lipid headgroup has been extensively studied, the impact of the acyl chain chemical structure on lipid-bound interfacial water has remained elusive. This study explores the influence of acyl tail unsaturation and chain length on the lipid headgroup packing and associated water organization in model membranes. The findings highlight the critical role of acyl chain chemistry in determining both membrane fluidity and hydration.
Biomembrane hydration is crucial for understanding processes at biological interfaces. While the effect of the lipid headgroup has been studied extensively, the effect (if any) of the acyl chain chemical structure on lipid-bound interfacial water has remained elusive. We study model membranes composed of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipids, the most abundant lipids in biomembranes. We explore the extent to which the lipid headgroup packing and associated water organization are affected by the lipid acyl tail unsaturation and chain length. To this end, we employ a combination of surface-sensitive techniques, including sum-frequency generation spectroscopy, surface pressure measurements, and Brewster angle microscopy imaging. Our results reveal that the acyl tail structure critically affects the headgroup phosphate orientational distribution and lipid-associated water molecules, for both PE and PC lipid monolayers at the air/water interface. These insights reveal the importance of acyl chain chemistry in determining not only membrane fluidity but also membrane hydration. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据