4.7 Article

Explicit models of motions to analyze NMR relaxation data in proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 157, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0095910

关键词

-

资金

  1. FET-Open project of the European Union
  2. [899683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a useful tool for studying molecular motions. The Model-Free (MF) approach has been widely used to analyze NMR relaxation rates, but complementing it with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is necessary to obtain a mechanistic understanding of the motions. This paper demonstrates how to build explicit models of methyl-bearing protein side chain motions and compares them with the MF approach.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a tool of choice to characterize molecular motions. In biological macromolecules, pico- to nanosecond motions, in particular, can be probed by nuclear spin relaxation rates, which depend on the time fluctuations of the orientations of spin interaction frames. For the past 40 years, relaxation rates have been successfully analyzed using the Model-Free (MF) approach, which makes no assumption on the nature of motions and reports on the effective amplitude and timescale of the motions. However, obtaining a mechanistic picture of motions from this type of analysis is difficult at best, unless complemented with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. In spite of their limited accuracy, such simulations can be used to obtain the information necessary to build explicit models of motions designed to analyze NMR relaxation data. Here, we present how to build such models, suited in particular to describe motions of methyl-bearing protein side chains and compare them with the MF approach. We show on synthetic data that explicit models of motions are more robust in the presence of rotamer jumps which dominate the relaxation in methyl groups of protein side chains. We expect this work to motivate the use of explicit models of motion to analyze MD and NMR data. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据