4.6 Article

Co-assembly behavior of oppositely charged thermoresponsive elastin-like polypeptide block copolymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52906

关键词

biomedical applications; biomimetic; proteins; stimuli-sensitive polymers; structure-property relationships

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2011164, 2018R1D1A1B07041887]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07041887, 2021R1A2C2011164] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of complex coacervate core micelles (C3Ms) from two oppositely charged elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) is studied in this research. It is found that the structure of the micelles changes with the variation of salt concentration and temperature.
The formation of complex coacervate core micelles (C3Ms) was observed by mixing two oppositely charged elastin-like polypeptides (ELP)-based diblock copolymers, each composed of a neutral and a charged moiety. The physical properties of C3Ms as a function of pH, temperature, and salt concentration were analyzed by UV-visible spectrometry, dynamic light scattering (DLS), H-1 NMR, and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). In distilled water (or low salt conditions), below the transition temperature (T-t), ELP mixtures induced the C3Ms with a complex coacervate core and a neutral corona; meanwhile, above the T-t, they aggregated by the hydrophobic interaction among the neutral coronas. However, as the salt concentration increased, the induced C3Ms gradually dissociated; while above the critical micellar temperature (CMT) and critical salt concentration (CSC), inverted hydrophobic core micelles surrounded by the charged blocks were created. Based on these results, we demonstrate that the co-assembly behavior of two oppositely charged diblock ELPs is harnessed by the salt concentration and temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据