4.6 Article

Strain engineering for enhanced hot-carrier photodetection

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099544

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
  3. Suzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects
  4. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution
  5. [62120106001]
  6. [61875143]
  7. [61905170]
  8. [BK20190816]
  9. [SYG202124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of strain on hot-carrier devices in gold material was investigated using calculations and simulations. The results show that compressive strain can increase hot-electron generation and improve the transport of hot carriers, leading to enhanced quantum efficiency and responsivity of the devices.
Hot-carrier devices in metal-semiconductor junctions have attracted considerable attention but still with quantum efficiencies far from expectations. Introducing the lattice strain to the material can effectively modulate the electronic structure, providing a way to control the hot-carrier dynamics. Here, we study how this strain affects the generation, transport, and injection of hot carriers in gold (Au) by using first-principles calculations and evaluate the overall responses of Au-based hot-carrier devices by Monte Carlo simulation. We find that the compressive strain can significantly increase the hot-electron generation from direct transition at E > 1.1 eV for Au. The compressive strain delocalizes the band structure and decreases the electron density of state, which, in turn, reduce electron-electron and electron-phonon scatterings to improve the transport of hot carriers. Taking the Au/TiO2 device as an example, we find that the compressive strain (-6%) can enable a 1.5- to 3-fold enhancement of quantum efficiency and responsivity at a photon energy between 1.2 and 3 eV. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据