4.6 Article

Thermal diffusivity in ion-irradiated single-crystal iron, chromium, vanadium, and tungsten measured using transient grating spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0089048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/L01663X/1]
  2. MIT-SUTD International Design Center (IDC)
  3. Henry Royce Institute through EPSRC [EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1, EP/P025498/1]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER [DMR-1654548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of radiation science has been accelerated by ion-irradiation experiments. This study used transient grating spectroscopy to investigate ion-irradiated single-crystals of iron, chromium, vanadium, and tungsten, and tracked the damage development through thermal diffusivity. The results showed a reduction in thermal diffusivity of tungsten with increasing irradiation dose.
The speed-up of radiation science development with the advent of ion-irradiation experiments has, until recently, been omitted in the post-irradiation examination technique. This paper reports the results of transient grating spectroscopy-a rapid, non-destructive, in situ photothermal surface technique-of ion-irradiated single-crystals of iron, chromium, vanadium, and tungsten at room temperature. Thermal diffusivity was used to track damage development throughout irradiation, with 5 MeV self-ion irradiated iron, chromium, and vanadium showing little to no change up to damages of the order of 1 dpa. 5 MeV Si3+-ion irradiated tungsten exhibits a reduction of thermal diffusivity from 0.78(7) to 0.29(2) cm(2) s (-1) with logarithmically increasing dose over a similar damage range. A comparison to literature of transient grating spectroscopy thermal diffusivity values past and present shows good agreement; radiation-induced change can be clearly distinguished from differences between mono- and poly-crystalline tungsten. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据