4.6 Article

Long-range stray field mapping of statically magnetized nanoparticles using magnetoresistive sensor

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 131, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0091365

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20H05652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyzing the spatial distribution of stray field from magnetic nanoparticles is crucial for designing and optimizing magnetometric systems in clinical magnetic particle imaging scanners. In this study, a magnetoresistive sensor was used to directly measure the stray field from a commercial magnetic nanoparticle suspension under a static field. The results show that the spatial distribution of the stray field is correlated with the geometry of the sample.
Analyzing the spatial distribution of stray field from magnetic nanoparticles is a crucial step to design and optimize the magnetometric system for a clinical magnetic particle imaging (MPI) scanner. Here, we used a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor to probe the stray field directly from a commercial magnetic nanoparticle suspension conditioned under a static field. For a given 20 mT by a small permanent magnet, the stray field of a liquid sample with a 0.7 mg Fe iron mass is in nanotesla order measured by the MR sensor at 50 mm apart from the sample, while the magnetization is comparable to several microtesla. This field decay demands picotesla sensitivity of the sensing system to record the stray field for a further distance or a smaller excitation field. Moreover, from a two-dimensional trajectory of sample and magnet movements relative to the sensor position, we confirmed that the spatial distribution of the stray field appeared to correlate with sample geometry. The distribution became broadening for low iron mass concentration of the sample. From this observation, an MR sensor proves its potential for locating the magnetic nanoparticles under a quasistatic field, which can be extensively implemented for a single-sided MPI scanner. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据