4.6 Article

Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for crystalline samples containing initial strain

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 131, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0091561

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under the Summer Faculty Fellowship Program (SFFP)
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory's LDRD Project [20220488MFR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) is a mature technique for characterizing the elastic properties of solids. This article introduces an alternative constitutive law that considers initial strain or prestrain caused by residual stress, integrating it into the RUS framework. The model demonstrates the sensitivity of resonances to prestrain and supports RUS as a potential nondestructive method for characterizing prestrain in materials.
Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) is a mature and robust technique for the nondestructive characterization of the elastic properties of solids capable of providing the elastic constants of anisotropic crystalline solids. The traditional method is based on assuming that the solid is linear elastic and, therefore, obeys a linearized Hookean constitutive relationship (Hooke's law). In this article, an alternative constitutive law is provided that allows for an initial strain or prestrain to be present stemming from residual stress. Then, the constitutive relationship is integrated into the RUS framework. The model is demonstrated using a realistic prestrain field obtained by simulating shot-peening processing of a polycrystalline Cu sample. The sensitivity of the resonances to the developed prestrain is established and discussed. This work allows researchers to consider the influence of initial strain or residual stress in their samples and the potential influence on accurate elastic constant estimates. The model also supports the potential of RUS for the nondestructive characterization of prestrain in materials. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据