4.7 Article

New methods for quantification of amoxicillin and clindamycin in human plasma using HPLC with UV detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 77, 期 9, 页码 2437-2440

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac195

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed simple and rapid HPLC methods for quantification of amoxicillin and clindamycin in human plasma. The methods showed good linearity, precision, and accuracy, making them suitable for routine use and clinical studies.
Objectives We aimed to develop simple and rapid HPLC methods for determination of amoxicillin and clindamycin in human plasma. Methods Plasma samples were pretreated by direct deproteinization with acetonitrile and the analytical separation took place on a reverse phase Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (2.7 mu m, 2.1 x 100 mm) with a gradient of acetonitrile. UV detection at 229 nm for amoxicillin and 204 nm for clindamycin was used for determination of the antibiotics in plasma. Results The calibration curves were linear over the concentration ranges of 1-100 mg/L for amoxicillin and 1-15 mg/L for clindamycin with a correlation coefficient of >= 0.98. Intra-assay precisions were all <= 15% and the accuracies were within +/- 15%. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was found to be 0.5 mg/L for amoxicillin and 1 mg/L for clindamycin with inter-assay imprecision coefficient of variances (CVs) of 18.7% and 15.6%, respectively. The present HPLC methods were successfully applied on spike-in samples and on plasma samples collected 4-6 and 3.5-5.5 h after oral antibiotic administration of 500 mg of amoxicillin and 600 mg of clindamycin, respectively. Conclusions We have developed HPLC methods with UV detection for quantification of amoxicillin and clindamycin in human plasma. The methods are fast, simple and suitable for use in routine settings and clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据