4.7 Article

Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Removing data and using metafounders alleviates biases for all traits in Lacaune dairy sheep predictions

F. L. Macedo et al.

Summary: This study analyzed 40 years of records from a dairy sheep breeding program to evaluate bias in genetic evaluations. The results showed that most models and scenarios exhibited bias, with an overestimate of genetic trend for milk yield and an underestimate for other traits. The study also found that using multiple-trait models and including genomic information can reduce bias, but only deletion of historical data completely eliminated bias.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction

Yutaka Masuda et al.

Summary: In this study, genetic trends were compared among models with UPG and MF H-inverses, showing that EUPG and MF H-inverses are preferred for their lack of genetic trend biases.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Technical note: Genetic groups in single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor

Jeremie Vandenplas et al.

Summary: Genetic groups, known as unknown or phantom parent groups, are often used in dairy cattle genetic evaluations to account for selection that cannot be explained by known genetic relationships. The Quaas and Pollak transformation can be applied to include genetic groups in the pedigree, reducing memory burden and computational costs compared to fitting genetic groups as covariates.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2021)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups

A. Cesarani et al.

Summary: The study aimed to assess the reliability and bias of estimated breeding values (EBV) from traditional BLUP, genomic EBV (GEBV) from single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with unknown parent groups (UPG). Results showed that ssGBLUP with UPG for both A and the relationship matrix among genotyped animals provided the most accurate and least biased evaluations.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2021)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP

M. Bermann et al.

Summary: The study compared different genomic scaling methods in single-step genomic BLUP and found that automatic scaling had a larger bias, while the accuracies of scaling by averages and automatic scaling were similar. The results suggest that bias may be small in real data, especially when the number of genotyped animals is large.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2021)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Investigating the persistence of accuracy of genomic predictions over time in broilers

Jorge Hidalgo et al.

Summary: This study found that adding genomic information significantly improves prediction accuracy and enhances the persistence of genomic predictions. Training sets without genomic data experience a faster decline in prediction accuracy compared to those with genomic information, demonstrating the importance of incorporating genomics in selection programs for improved accuracy and sustainability.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions

Sabrina Kluska et al.

Summary: The study investigated the use of metafounders and unknown parent groups for genomic evaluation of a composite beef cattle population, finding that models with genomic information had higher accuracy and stability. Genomic models with metafounders appeared to be slightly more stable, showing higher similarity of results with different numbers of groups.

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS (2021)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Behavior of the Linear Regression method to estimate bias and accuracies with correct and incorrect genetic evaluation models

F. L. Macedo et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2020)

Review Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Current status of genomic evaluation

Ignacy Misztal et al.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle

A. A. Kudinov et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls

S. Tsuruta et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Efficient and accurate computation of base generation allele frequencies

M. N. Aldridge et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP

H. L. Bradford et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP

Oyvind Nordbo et al.

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method

Andres Legarra et al.

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2018)

Article Mathematics, Applied

Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing

Jeff Bezanson et al.

SIAM REVIEW (2017)

Article Genetics & Heredity

The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection

Wan-Ling . Hsu et al.

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS (2017)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Computational strategies for alternative single-step Bayesian regression models with large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals

Rohan L. Fernando et al.

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2016)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives

Mehdi Sargolzaei et al.

BMC GENOMICS (2014)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins

S. Tsuruta et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2014)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses

Rohan L. Fernando et al.

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2014)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Unknown-parent groups in single-step genomic evaluation

I. Misztal et al.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS (2013)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation

Ole F. Christensen

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2012)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection

Z. G. Vitezica et al.

GENETICS RESEARCH (2011)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

The unified approach to the use of genomic and pedigree information in genomic evaluations revisited

T. H. E. Meuwissen et al.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS (2011)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale

C. Y. Chen et al.

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE (2011)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies

Joseph E. Powell et al.

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2010)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped

Ole F. Christensen et al.

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION (2010)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information

A. Legarra et al.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2009)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions

P. M. VanRaden

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2008)