4.7 Article

Estimating the trace of the matrix inverse by interpolating from the diagonal of an approximate inverse

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 828-844

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.001

关键词

Matrix trace; Monte Carlo method; Variance reduction; Preconditioner; Fitting; Interpolation

资金

  1. NSF [CCF 1218349, ACI SI2-SSE 1440700]
  2. DOE [DE-FC02-12ER41890]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1440700] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1218349] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of applications require the computation of the trace of a matrix that is implicitly available through a function. A common example of a function is the inverse of a large, sparse matrix, which is the focus of this paper. When the evaluation of the function is expensive, the task is computationally challenging because the standard approach is based on a Monte Carlo method which converges slowly. We present a different approach that exploits the pattern correlation, if present, between the diagonal of the inverse of the matrix and the diagonal of some approximate inverse that can be computed inexpensively. We leverage various sampling and fitting techniques to fit the diagonal of the approximation to the diagonal of the inverse. Depending on the quality of the approximate inverse, our method may serve as a standalone kernel for providing a fast trace estimate with a small number of samples. Furthermore, the method can be used as a variance reduction method for Monte Carlo in some cases. This is decided dynamically by our algorithm. An extensive set of experiments with various technique combinations on several matrices from some real applications demonstrate the potential of our method. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据