4.7 Article

Quantitation of 20 Phytosterols in 34 Different Accessions of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 32, 页码 9856-9864

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03374

关键词

quinoa; phytosterol; sterol pattern; delta-sterol; gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS); countercurrent chromatography

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (DFG) [VE 164/20-1]
  2. Landesgraduiertenfo?rderung Baden-Wuerttemberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed phytosterols in 34 different quinoa accessions and identified multiple sterols using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. A novel internal standard was used for quantification and minor sterols were determined after enrichment. The total sterol content in quinoa was found to be higher than previously reported, with & UDelta;7-sterols contributing the most. Cluster analysis grouped the accessions into four distinct groups based on different sterol patterns.
Phytosterols were analyzed in 34 different quinoa accessions, which were obtained from the same field trial. Twenty different sterols were detected, and 17 could be structurally assigned by means of gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Sterols were quantitated in selected ion monitoring mode (GC/MS-SIM) with the novel internal standard 3-O-tert- butyldimethylsilyl-cholestanol (cholestanyl-TBDMS). GC/MS-SIM response factors of minor sterols were determined after enrichment by countercurrent chromatography. The total sterol contents varied from 120 to 180 mg/100 g of seeds, which is higher than has been described in quinoa before. This was due to the fact that & UDelta;7-sterols (e.g., delta 7-sitosterol, spinasterol, and delta 7-avenasterol) were quantitated for the first time in quinoa and contributed & SIM;64% to the total sterol content. Clustering allowed distributing of the 34 different quinoa accessions into four distinct groups on the basis of the different sterol patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据