4.7 Article

Chlorogenic Acid Prevents Hyperuricemia Nephropathy via Regulating TMAO-Related Gut Microbes and Inhibiting the PI3K/ AKT/mTOR Pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 33, 页码 10182-10193

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03099

关键词

hyperuricemia nephropathy; gut microbiota; trimethylamine N-oxide; kidney fibrosis; inflammation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32101962]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorogenic acid (CGA) shows potential as a substance for preventing hyperuricemia nephropathy (HN) by reducing uric acid levels, relieving oxidative stress and inflammation, and alleviating kidney fibrosis. It regulates the cascade response of the microbiota-TMAO-PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, thereby delaying kidney fibrosis.
Hyperuricemia is an independent hazard factor of renal injury and can induce renal fibrosis, promoting the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to explore the probability of chlorogenic acid (CGA) as a potential substance for preventing hyperuricemia nephropathy (HN). Pretreatment with CGA downregulated SUA, BUN, and CR levels, relieved oxidative stress and inflammatory response, alleviated kidney fibrosis, and contributed to the prevention of HN. In the gut microbiota, Blautia, Enterococcus, and Faecalibaculum related to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) synthesis were significantly increased in HN rats. In addition, it showed a significant increase in serum TMAO content in HN rats. However, CGA regulated the cascade response of the microbiota-TMAO signaling to reverse the increase of serum TMAO. CGA also decreased the protein expression of protein kinase B (AKT) phosphorylation, phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by reducing the production of TMAO. CGA delayed kidney fibrosis in HN rats as evidenced by regulating the cascade response of the microbiota-TMAO-PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. In summary, CGA can be an excellent candidate for HN prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据