4.7 Article

Detection of Acrylamide in Foodstuffs by Nanobody-Based Immunoassays

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01872

关键词

acrylamide; nanobody; ELISA; electrochemical immunoassay

资金

  1. Lingnan Moder n Agricultural Science And Technology Guangdong Laboratory Independent Scientific Research Project [NZ2021032]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31972157]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFE0116600]
  4. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B020211002]
  5. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  6. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety [2020B1212060059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A specific nanobody Nb-7E against acrylamide was isolated and confirmed to be able to detect acrylamide. An ic-ELISA and an ECIA were developed for acrylamide determination, with ECIA showing lower limit of detection and wider linear detection range.
Acrylamide is toxic aliphatic amide formed via the Maillard reaction between asparagine and reducing sugars during thermal processing of food. Herein, a specific nanobody termed Nb-7E against the acrylamide derivative xanthyl acrylamide (XAA) was isolated from an immunized phage display library and confirmed to be able to detect acrylamide. First, an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) was established for acrylamide with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.089 mu g/mL and working range from 0.23 to 5.6 mu g/mL. Furthermore, an enhanced electrochemical immunoassay (ECIA) was developed based on the optimized reaction conditions. The LOD was as low as 0.033 mu g/mL, threefold improved compared to that of ic-ELISA, and a wider linear detection range from 0.39 to 50.0 mu g/mL was achieved. The average recoveries ranged from 88.29 to 111.76% in spiked baked biscuits and potato crisps. Finally, the analytical performance of the ECIA was validated by standard ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据