4.7 Review

Information technology-based versus face-to-face cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 429-440

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.048

关键词

Cognitive behavioural therapy; Internet; Information technology; Face-to-face; Anxiety; Depression

资金

  1. Health and Medical Research Fund [17180271]
  2. Food and Health Bureau, The Government of Hong Kong SAR
  3. Govern-ment of Hong Kong SAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically reviewed the efficacy of information technology-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (FCBT) for managing anxiety and depression in adult patients. The results showed that there was no significant difference between ICBT and FCBT in reducing symptom severity, indicating that ICBT is non-inferior to FCBT. However, the adherence rate was lower in ICBT and careful consideration is needed in the decision-making process.
Background: We aimed to systematically review the efficacy of information technology-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (FCBT) for management of anxiety and depression in adult patients.Methods: Systematic literature search for clinical trials comparing ICBT to FCBT in adults diagnosed with anxiety or depression was conducted. Quantitative analyses were performed to examine the efficacy of ICBT versus FCBT. Primacy outcome was change in symptom severity.Results: A total of 11 publications (10 studies and 896 participants) were included. The pooled effect size of ICBT versus FCBT did not find significant difference for post-treatment anxiety or depressive symptoms severity (Hedges' g = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.06), and ICBT was non-inferior to FCBT (at Cohen's d = 0.3). Maintenance of treatment efficacy also showed no significant difference between ICBT and FCBT at 6 months (g = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.14) and 12 months (g = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.32) post-treatment. Adherence rate was lower in ICBT than FCBT but did not achieve statistically significance (61% vs 88%; RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.74 to1.00). Results were not affected by study quality.Limitations: The examination of study heterogeneity was limited by the small number of studies.Conclusions: We found non-inferior performance of ICBT versus FCBT in reducing symptoms in patients diagnosed of anxiety or depressive disorders. With the social-distancing measures amid COVID-19 pandemic, service providers should give serious consideration with great caution in the decision-making process of offering ICBT to patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据