4.5 Review

Recent progress in carbon fibers for boosting electrocatalytic energy conversion

期刊

IONICS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 5259-5273

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04664-7

关键词

Carbon fibers; Electrocatalysis; Energy conversion; Activity

资金

  1. Qing Lan Project, Jiangsu Province, China
  2. 2021 Yangzhou City Policy Guidance Plan (International Science and Technology Cooperation) [YZ2021181]
  3. Changzhou Science and Technology Plan projects, China [CJ20180012]
  4. Changzhou Key Laboratory of Ecological Textile Technology, China [CM20183003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a systematic review of carbon fibers and their applications in electrocatalytic reactions. It discusses the synthesis strategy, properties, and crucial role of carbon fibers in driving electrocatalytic reactions, and explores the challenges and prospects of fiber materials in electrocatalysis applications.
Carbon fibers enjoy the intrinsic advantages in large specific surface area, controllable chemical compositions, excellent electrical conductivity, and rich composite forms, which thus endow them with enormous promise for future application in energy conversion technologies. Past decades have witnessed the rapid development of carbon fibers and their applications in electrocatalytic reactions. To explore the advance of this interesting field, we herein organize a systematic review by focusing on the syntheses, modifications, and properties of fiber materials and their applications in electrocatalytic reactions. This review is started by providing a discussion about the synthesis strategy of carbon fibers and fiber-based materials. Subsequently, a deep discussion about the crucial role of carbon fibers played in driving electrocatalytic reactions is also added, hoping to provide a better understanding on the role of carbon fibers in the application of electrocatalytic reactions. Finally, the challenges and prospects of fiber materials in electrocatalysis applications are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据