4.2 Article

Changes in chloremia, secondary to hydric reanimation during the first 24 hours, increases hospital stay and complications in patients with acute pancreatitis.

期刊

INVESTIGACION CLINICA
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 137-146

出版社

INST INVESTIGACION CLINICA
DOI: 10.54817/IC.v63n2a03

关键词

Pancreatitis; chlorides; isotonic solutions; length of stay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that an increase in serum chloride levels is associated with a longer hospital stay in patients with acute pancreatitis, but it does not significantly affect complications and mortality.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) requires first-line treatment with intensive fluid resuscitation. Hydroelectrolyte changes secondary to this management could be related to an increase in hospital stay, complications, and mortality. The objective of this study was to correlate the increase in serum chlorine (> 8mEq / L) during the first 24 hours (ISC) with a longer hospital stay, complications and mortality in patients with AP. A total of 110 patients with AP admitted to the emergency room were included. Fluid management and serum chlorine were recorded on admission and after 24 hours; duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality, were also registered. 37 patients had ISC (age 56.4 +/- 18.4 years; 51% women), there were no differences in age, sex or type of fluid management with patients without ISC. In bivariate analysis, ISC was associated with severe AP (30% vs 12%, p = 0.02), higher APACHE II score at admission (8 [6-15] vs 6 [4-9] points, p = 0.006), and longer hospital stay (9 [7-12] vs 7 [5-10] days, p = 0.03). The overall mortality and complications rate were 16% and 25%, respectively, with no differences between the groups (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.1 and 35% vs. 19%, p = 0.06). After multivariate adjustment, independent predictors of hospital stay were ISC> 8 mEq / L (p = 0.01) and APACHE II scores at 24 hours (p = 0.02). We conclude that ISC is associated with a longer hospital stay in patients with AP from a second-level hospital care population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据