4.6 Article

Inverse medium scattering problems with Kalman filter techniques

期刊

INVERSE PROBLEMS
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/ac836f

关键词

inverse acoustic scattering; inhomogeneous medium; far field pattern; Tikhonov regularization; Kalman filter; Levenberg-Marquardt; extended Kalman filter

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21J00119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the inverse medium scattering problem and proposes two reconstruction algorithms based on the Kalman filter. These algorithms can avoid constructing large system equations and retain the information of past updates.
We study the inverse medium scattering problem to reconstruct the unknown inhomogeneous medium from the far field patterns of scattered waves. The inverse scattering problem is generally ill-posed and nonlinear, and the iterative optimization method is often adapted. A natural iterative approach to this problem is to place all available measurements and mappings into one long vector and mapping, respectively, and to iteratively solve the linearized large system equation using the Tikhonov regularization method, which is called Levenberg-Marquardt scheme. However, this is computationally expensive because we must construct the larger system equations when the number of available measurements is increasing. In this paper, we propose two reconstruction algorithms based on the Kalman filter. One is the algorithm equivalent to the Levenberg-Marquardt scheme, and the other is inspired by the extended Kalman filter. For the algorithm derivation, we iteratively apply the Kalman filter to the linearized equation for our nonlinear equation. By applying the Kalman filter, our proposed algorithms sequentially update the state and the weight of the norm for the state space, which avoids the construction of large system equation, and retains the information of past updates. Finally, we provide numerical examples to demonstrate the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据