4.5 Article

Free Vibration Analysis of FRP Sandwich Composite Plate and Quantification of Uncertainties in its Vibration Response

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219455423500323

关键词

FRP sandwich composites; free vibration analysis; uncertainty quantification; goodness-of-fit tests; natural frequency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sandwich composite structures can exhibit significant variation in their dynamic behavior due to uncertainties in the manufacturing processes, material properties, and geometry. This study focuses on quantifying and modeling the variability in the dynamic behavior of a glass-fiber reinforced plastic sandwich composite plate through free vibration analysis. The uncertainty of the natural frequencies is quantified using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests, and an appropriate probabilistic distribution is recommended to describe the variability of the vibrational response.
Sandwich composite structures may have a significant variation in their dynamic behavior due to the uncertain preconditions of the manufacturing processes, material properties, geometry, etc. Therefore, quantifying and modeling such variability in the dynamic behavior of sandwich composite structures is a necessity. In this study, free vibration analysis is carried out for a glass-fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) sandwich composite plate. The natural frequencies are obtained by taking into account various uncertainties involved in preparing the sandwich composite plate. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and Anderson-Darling (AD) goodness-of-fit (GOF) tests are performed for the quantification of the uncertainty of the natural frequencies. The appropriate probabilistic distribution describing the variability of the vibrational response is recommended. The knowledge of the uncertainty of dynamic responses might help to control the quality of the manufacturing process, as well as for the reliability study of the sandwich composite structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据