4.6 Article

Tunable buckling configurations via in-plane periodicity in soft 3D-fiber composites: Simulations and experiments

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111711

关键词

Fiber composites; Soft materials; Finite deformations; Instabilities; Pattern formations; Buckling plane

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [852281-MAGIC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The buckling behavior of soft 3D-fiber composites with varying microstructure periodicity is studied. The orientation of out-of-plane buckling is determined by material properties, volume fractions, and periodicity. A buckling configuration map is provided in the design-space, predicting that these instability patterns will enrich the design of deformation-controlled tunable materials.
We study the buckling of soft 3D-fiber composites (FCs) with varying in-plane microstructure periodicity. Through our experiments and simulations, we find that the out-of-plane buckling orientation of fibers is determined by the constituent material properties, volume fractions, and the in-plane periodicity. The examples are given for the FCs with rectangular in-plane arrangement of fibers, i.e., the fibers are periodically situated at distance a from each other in one principal direction and distance b along the other principal direction (b > a). We provide a buckling configuration map in the design-space of geometric parameters (fiber volume fraction and in-plane periodicity aspect ratio, b/a). Pre-determined by the microstructure parameters, the fibers buckle towards (i) the first principal direction along which the fibers are closer to each other, or (ii) the second principal direction, or (iii) towards a non-principal direction. Furthermore, we find that the characteristics of the buckling plane map is governed by the shear modulus contrast between the phases of FCs. We anticipate that the distinct instability patterns reported here will enrich the design-space for building deformation-controlled tunable materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据