4.7 Review

A literature review and design methodology for digital twins in the era of zero defect manufacturing

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 16, 页码 5723-5743

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2101960

关键词

Quality assurance; quality control; zero defect manufacturing; digital twin; standardise; methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the literature on the implementation of digital twins for zero-defect manufacturing and proposes a standardized design methodology to guide researchers and practitioners. The study presents a comprehensive analysis of the research area and provides insights into the current state and limitations of research and practice. The proposed design methodology covers essential elements for developing digital twins for zero-defect manufacturing in any domain.
In this paper, we analyze the literature concerning the implementation of digital twins (DTs) for zero-defect manufacturing (ZDM) following a systematic method and, guided by a preliminary finding that a structured and standardised approach to the development of the DT applications is lacking, we provide a standardised design methodology to guide researchers and practitioners in their efforts to develop DTs regardless of the domain. After examination and interpretation of the literature, we also present the results of our state-of-the-art analysis, discuss the current state and limitations of research and practice, and provide useful insights on this important and complex topic. The design methodology proposed in our study will benefit both practitioners and academicians by covering the essential elements to be considered when developing DTs for ZDM for any applications in this domain. The study also contributes to knowledge by presenting a structured overview of the specific research area with a comprehensive, systematic, and critical analysis of the literature and by providing answers to some fundamental questions in the context of DTs for ZDM. Finally, we provide suggestions for further developments in research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据