4.7 Article

Fibroblast Growth Factor 7 Suppresses Fibrosis and Promotes Epithelialization during Wound Healing in Mouse Fetuses

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137087

关键词

fibroblast growth factor; skin regeneration; mouse; fibrosis; scar

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 20K18422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin wounds in developing mouse fetuses can heal without scar formation, unlike adult mammalian wounds. It has been found that the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family plays a crucial role in fetal wound healing, with FGF7 potentially being associated with scar formation. Administration of FGF7 can inhibit fibrosis and promote epithelialization, providing a potential therapeutic option for scarless wound healing.
Adult mammalian wounds leave visible scars, whereas skin wounds in developing mouse fetuses are scarless until a certain point in development when complete regeneration occurs, including the structure of the dermis and skin appendages. Analysis of the molecular mechanisms at this transition will provide clues for achieving scarless wound healing. The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family is a key regulator of inflammation and fibrosis during wound healing. We aimed to determine the expression and role of FGF family members in fetal wound healing. ICR mouse fetuses were surgically wounded at embryonic day 13 (E13), E15, and E17. Expression of FGF family members and FGF receptor (FGFR) in tissue samples from these fetuses was evaluated using in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Fgfr1 was downregulated in E15 and E17 wounds, and its ligand Fgf7 was upregulated in E13 and downregulated in E15 and E17. Recombinant FGF7 administration in E15 wounds suppressed fibrosis and promoted epithelialization at the wound site. Therefore, the expression level of Fgf7 may correlate with scar formation in late mouse embryos, and external administration of FGF7 may represent a therapeutic option to suppress fibrosis and reduce scarring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据