4.7 Article

Impact of Double Covalent Binding of BV in NIR FPs on Their Spectral and Physicochemical Properties

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137347

关键词

bacterial phytochrome; near-infrared biomarkers; stability; proteolytic degradation; fluorescence quantum yield; biliverdin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the photophysical properties and stability of near-infrared fluorescent proteins based on bacterial phytochromes is crucial for designing efficient fluorescent probes. It has been found that the covalent binding of the natural ligand biliverdin to these proteins leads to higher quantum yield of fluorescence and increased stability due to rigid fixation of the chromophore in the chromophore-binding pocket.
Understanding the photophysical properties and stability of near-infrared fluorescent proteins (NIR FPs) based on bacterial phytochromes is of great importance for the design of efficient fluorescent probes for use in cells and in vivo. Previously, the natural ligand of NIR FPs biliverdin (BV) has been revealed to be capable of covalent binding to the inherent cysteine residue in the PAS domain (Cys15), and to the cysteine residue introduced into the GAF domain (Cys256), as well as simultaneously with these two residues. Here, based on the spectroscopic analysis of several NIR FPs with both cysteine residues in PAS and GAF domains, we show that the covalent binding of BV simultaneously with two domains is the reason for the higher quantum yield of BV fluorescence in these proteins as a result of rigid fixation of the chromophore in their chromophore-binding pocket. We demonstrate that since the attachment sites are located in different regions of the polypeptide chain forming a figure-of-eight knot, their binding to BV leads to shielding of many sites of proteolytic degradation due to additional stabilization of the entire protein structure. This makes NIR FPs with both cysteine residues in PAS and GAF domains less susceptible to cleavage by intracellular proteases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据