4.7 Article

HDAC Class I Inhibitor Domatinostat Preferentially Targets Glioma Stem Cells over Their Differentiated Progeny

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158084

关键词

glioma initiating cell; tumor initiating cell; epigenetic modulation; stemness

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20K07631, 21H03040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to discover novel drugs for the treatment of therapy-resistant brain tumors. The researchers found that domatinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, can selectively eliminate glioma stem cells and inhibit their self-renewal capacity.
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are in general characterized by higher resistance to cell death and cancer therapies than non-stem differentiated cancer cells. However, we and others have recently revealed using glioma stem cells (GSCs) as a model that, unexpectedly, CSCs have specific vulnerabilities that make them more sensitive to certain drugs compared with their differentiated counterparts. We aimed in this study to discover novel drugs targeting such Achilles' heels of GSCs as anti-GSC drug candidates to be used for the treatment of glioblastoma, the most therapy-resistant form of brain tumors. Here we report that domatinostat (4SC-202), a class I HDAC inhibitor, is one such candidate. At concentrations where it showed no or minimal growth inhibitory effect on differentiated GSCs and normal cells, domatinostat effectively inhibited the growth of GSCs mainly by inducing apoptosis. Furthermore, GSCs that survived domatinostat treatment lost their self-renewal capacity. These results suggested that domatinostat is a unique drug that selectively eliminates GSCs not only physically by inducing cell death but also functionally by inhibiting their self-renewal. Our findings also imply that class I HDACs and/or LSD1, another target of domatinostat, may possibly have a specific role in the maintenance of GSCs and therefore could be an attractive target in the development of anti-GSC therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据