4.7 Article

Study of Type II ε-PL Degrading Enzyme (pldII) in Streptomyces albulus through the CRISPRi System

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126691

关键词

epsilon-Poly-L-lysine; Streptomyces albulus; epsilon-PL degrading enzyme

资金

  1. Project of theShanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China [22N51900600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the CRISPRi system to inhibit the degradation enzyme pldII and found that the inhibition improved the antibacterial effect of ε-PL. The molecular weight distribution of ε-PL changed after inhibition, and the degradation mechanism of ε-PL in S. albulus was revealed through homology modeling and substrate docking of pldII.
epsilon-Poly-L-lysine (epsilon-PL) is a widely used antibacterial peptide polymerized of 25-35 L-lysine residues. The antibacterial effect of epsilon-PL is closely related to the polymerization degree. However, the mechanism of epsilon-PL degradation in S. albulus remains unclear. This study utilized the integrative plasmid pSET152-based CRISPRi system to transcriptionally repress the epsilon-PL degrading enzyme (pldII). The expression of pldII is regulated by changing the recognition site of dCas9. Through the epsilon-PL bacteriostatic experiments of repression strains, it was found that the repression of pldII improves the antibacterial effect of the epsilon-PL product. The consecutive MALDI-TOF-MS results confirmed that the molecular weight distribution of the epsilon-PL was changed after repression. The repression strain S1 showed a particular peak with a polymerization degree of 44, and other repression strains also generated epsilon-PL with a polymerization degree of over 40. Furthermore, the homology modeling and substrate docking of pldII, a typical endo-type metallopeptidase, were performed to resolve the degradation mechanism of epsilon-PL in S. albulus. The hydrolysis of epsilon-PL within pldII, initiated from the N-terminus by two amino acid-binding residues, Thr194 and Glu281, led to varying levels of polymerization of epsilon-PL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据