4.7 Article

Time-dependent deformation of biological tissue under ultrasonic irradiation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107432

关键词

Poroelastic material; Acoustomechanics; Acoustic radiation stress; Acoustofluidics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075416, 11772248, 11761131003, U1737107]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a theoretical model for analyzing the time-dependent deformation of poroelastic materials under ultrasonic fields, showing that the material can be stretched or compressed depending on the ratio of thickness to acoustic wavelength. The relaxation process of acoustic deformation is explored, shedding light on the mechanical properties of the material.
This work proposes a theoretical model for analyzing the time-dependent deformation of poroelastic materials, as a tissue model, under the action of an ultrasonic field, which considers the diffusion fluid transport that obeys Darcy's law. An acoustomechanical constitutive law is developed, which takes into account the mechanical stress generated by poroelastic deformation based on the classical poroelastic theory and the acoustic radiation stress generated by propagating ultrasonic waves. As an example, the time-dependent deformation of a poroelastic sheet subjected to two counter-propagating waves is calculated using the theoretical model, which is also verified by our finite element model. The results show that the sheet can be stretched or compressed, which depends on the ratio of the sheet thickness to the acoustic wavelength. Additionally, by exploring the relaxation process of the acoustic deformation, the role of the sheet thickness and porosity in determining the time of poroelastic relaxation is examined. This work is very helpful for understanding the deformation of tissues under ultrasonic fields, and also provides a method to extract the mechanical properties of tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据