4.7 Article

Electronic regulation and core-shell hybrids engineering of palm-leaf-like NiFe/Co(PO3)2 bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 66, 页码 28475-28485

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.148

关键词

Electrocatalyst; Overall water splitting; Core-shell structure; Reconfiguration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675131]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2020jcyj- zdxmX0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting were constructed by synthesizing core-shell hybrids with hierarchical structures. The interfacial effect in the core-shell structure modulated the electronic structure of the active sites, resulting in enhanced intrinsic activity and durability.
Constructing efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting remains a challenge because of the sluggish reaction kinetics. Herein, the core-shell hy-brids composed of Co(PO3)2 nanorod core and NiFe alloy shell in situ grown on nickel foam (NiFe/Co(PO3)2@NF) are synthesized. Owing to the hierarchical palm-leaf-like structures and strong adhesion between NiFe alloys, Co(PO3)2 and substrates, the catalyst provides a large surface area and rapid charge transfer, which facilitates active sites exposure and conductivity enhancement. The interfacial effect in the NiFe/Co(PO3)2 core-shell structure modulates the electronic structure of the active sites around the boundary, thereby boosting the intrinsic activity. Benefiting from the stable structure, the durability of the catalyst is not impaired by the inevitable surface reconfiguration. The NiFe/Co(PO3)2@NF electrode presents a low cell voltage of 1.63 V to achieve 10 mA cm-2 and manifests durability for up to 36 h at different current densities.(c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据