4.7 Article

Research on intelligent prediction of hydrogen pipeline leakage fire based on Finite Ridgelet neural network

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 55, 页码 23316-23323

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.124

关键词

Finite ridgelet neural network; Improved firefly algorithm; Hydrogen pipeline; Fire risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a finite Ridgelet neural network optimized by improved firefly algorithm for predicting the fire risk of hydrogen pipeline leakage. By summarizing related research, a finite Ridgelet neural network is constructed and a fire risk level prediction procedure is designed. Experimental results show that the proposed network has advantages in prediction precision and accuracy, and can effectively predict the safety status of hydrogen pipeline.
In order to effectively predict fire risk of hydrogen pipeline leakage and improve the safe level of hydrogen pipeline, the finite Ridgelet neural network optimized by improved firefly algorithm is constructed. Related researches on pipeline leakage fire risk and corresponding prediction models are summarized. The finite Ridgelet neural network is constructed by using finite Ridgelet function as excitation function of node in hidden layer, and the structure of finite Ridgelet neural network is established. The improved firefly algorithm based on location update mechanism is designed to optimize the parameters of finite Ridgelet neural network. And then the fire risk level prediction procedure of hydrogen pipeline is designed. Finally, forty training samples and ten testing samples are selected to carry out fire risk level prediction analysis, results show that the proposed finite Ridgelet neural network optimized by improved firefly algorithm has advantages in prediction precision and accuracy, which can effectively predict the safety status of hydrogen pipeline. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据