4.1 Article

Hemolysis induced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 55-59

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03387-9

关键词

PNH; mRNA vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; Complement inhibitor; Hemolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports on the incidence of hemolysis induced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). The use of complement inhibitors in PNH patients was found to reduce the occurrence of hemolytic reactions following vaccination.
Autoimmune and complement-related hematological side effects have been observed with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines. Here, we report the incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine-induced hemolysis in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). We reviewed the medical records of seventeen patients with PNH visiting the University of Tsukuba Hospital who had received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine between May 2021 and November 2021. Twelve patients were being treated with complement inhibitors. The median age of all patients was 62 years (range 29-89 years).; six were males and eleven were females. Fourteen patients received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) and three received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna). The median percentages of PNH clones in erythrocytes and granulocytes were 37.61% (range 8.11-85.71%) and 59.73% (range 3.76-97.82%), respectively. Of the twelve patients receiving complement inhibitors, only one had a hemolytic reaction after vaccination, but it did not meet the definition of breakthrough hemolysis. By contrast, hemolytic attacks were observed in two of the five untreated patients with PNH, and one of them required a blood transfusion. Appropriate administration of complement inhibitors to patients with PNH may prevent hemolysis induced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据